# 8 Graphing: One Variable at a Time

One Categorical Variable

Please watch the Chapter 08 Video below.

Video: 06. Graphing: One Variable at a Time

Consider the data frame EPIDURALF from the PASWR2 package which records intermediate results from a study to determine whether the traditional sitting position or the hamstring stretch position is superior for administering epidural anesthesia to pregnant women in labor as measured by the number of obstructive (needle to bone) contacts. In this study, there were four physicians. To summarize the number of patients treated by each physician we can use the function xtabs.

library(PASWR2)
xtabs(~doctor, data = EPIDURALF)
doctor
A   B   C   D
61 115  93  73 

A barplot of the number of patients treated by each physician (doctor) using ggplot2 is constructed below.

library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data = EPIDURALF, aes(x = doctor)) +
geom_bar(fill = "lightblue") +
theme_bw()

Here is some information that would be interesting to get from these data:

What percentage of the patients were treated by each physician?

prop.table(xtabs(~doctor, data = EPIDURALF))
doctor
A         B         C         D
0.1783626 0.3362573 0.2719298 0.2134503 

How are patients divided across physicians? Are they equally divided? If not, do the percentages follow some other kind of pattern?

One Quantitative Variable

We have explored the distribution of a categorical variable using a bar chart supplemented by numerical measures (percent of observations in each category). In this section, we will learn how to display the distribution of a quantitative variable.

To display data from one quantitative variable graphically, we typically use the histogram.

Example5

Break the following range of values into intervals and count how many observations fall into each interval.

Here are the exam grades of 15 students: 88, 48, 60, 51, 57, 85, 69, 75, 97, 72, 71, 79, 65, 63, 73

We first need to break the range of values into intervals (also called “bins” or “classes”). In this case, since our dataset consists of exam scores, it will make sense to choose intervals that typically correspond to the range of a letter grade, 10 points wide: 40-50, 50-60, … 90-100. By counting how many of the 15 observations fall in each of the intervals, we get the following table:

SCORE COUNT
[40,50) 1
[50,60) 2
[60,70) 4
[70,80) 5
[80,90) 2
[90,100) 1

To construct the histogram from this table we plot the intervals on the $$X$$-axis, and show the number of observations in each interval (frequency of the interval) on the $$Y$$-axis, which is represented by the height of a rectangle located above the interval:

Interpreting the Histogram

Once the distribution has been displayed graphically, we can describe the overall pattern of the distribution and mention any striking deviations from that pattern. More specifically, we should consider the following features of the distribution:

• Shape
• Center
• Outliers

We will get a sense of the overall pattern of the data from the histogram’s center, spread, and shape, while outliers will highlight deviations from that pattern.

Shape

When describing the shape of a distribution, we should consider:

• Symmetry/skewness of the distribution.
• Peakedness (modality)—the number of peaks (modes) the distribution has.

We distinguish between:

Symmetric Distributions

Note that all three distributions are symmetric, but are different in their modality (peakedness). The first distribution is unimodal—it has one mode (roughly at 10) around which the observations are concentrated. The second distribution is bimodal—it has two modes (roughly at 10 and 20) around which the observations are concentrated. The third distribution is kind of flat, or uniform. The distribution has no modes, or no value around which the observations are concentrated. Rather, we see that the observations are roughly uniformly distributed among the different values.

Skewed Right Distributions

A distribution is called skewed right if, as in the histogram above, the right tail (larger values) is much longer than the left tail (small values). Note that in a skewed right distribution, the bulk of the observations are small/medium, with a few observations that are much larger than the rest. An example of a real-life variable that has a skewed right distribution is salary. Most people earn in the low/medium range of salaries, with a few exceptions (CEOs, professional athletes etc.) that are distributed along a large range (long “tail”) of higher values.

Skewed Left Distributions

A distribution is called skewed left if, as in the histogram above, the left tail (smaller values) is much longer than the right tail (larger values). Note that in a skewed left distribution, the bulk of the observations are medium/large, with a few observations that are much smaller than the rest. An example of a real life variable that has a skewed left distribution is age of death from natural causes (heart disease, cancer, etc.). Most such deaths happen at older ages, with fewer cases happening at younger ages.

As you can see from the histogram, the grades distribution is roughly symmetric.

Center

The center of the distribution is its midpoint—the value that divides the distribution so that approximately half the observations take smaller values, and approximately half the observations take larger values. Note that from looking at the histogram we can get only a rough estimate for the center of the distribution. (More exact ways of finding measures of center will be discussed in the next section.)

Recall our grades example (image above). As you can see from the histogram, the center of the grades distribution is roughly 70 (7 students scored below 70, and 8 students scored above 70).

The spread (also called variability) of the distribution can be described by the approximate range covered by the data. From looking at the histogram, we can approximate the smallest observation (minimum), and the largest observation (maximum), and thus approximate the range.

In our example:

exam <- c(88, 48, 60, 51, 57, 85, 69, 75, 97, 72, 71, 79, 65, 63, 73)
min(exam)
[1] 48
max(exam)
[1] 97
range(exam)
[1] 48 97

Outliers

Outliers are observations that fall outside the overall pattern. For example, the following histogram represents a distribution that has a high probable outlier:

The overall pattern of the distribution of a quantitative variable is described by its shape, center, and spread. By inspecting the histogram, we can describe the shape of the distribution, but, as we saw, we can only get a rough estimate for the center and spread. A description of the distribution of a quantitative variable must include, in addition to the graphical display, a more precise numerical description of the center and spread of the distribution.

The two main numerical measures for the center of a distribution are the mean and the median. Each one of these measures is based on a completely different idea of describing the center of a distribution.

Mean

The mean is the average of a set of observations (i.e., the sum of the observations divided by the number of observations). If the $$n$$ observations are $$x_1, x_2,\ldots,x_n$$, their mean, which we denote $$\bar{x}$$ (and read x-bar), is therefore: $\bar{x}=\frac{x_1+ x_2+\cdots+x_n}{n}$.

World Cup Soccer

The data frame SOCCER from the PASWR2 package contains how many goals were scored in the regulation 90 minute periods of World Cup soccer matches from 1990 to 2002.

Total # of Goals Game Frequency
0 19
1 49
2 60
3 47
4 32
5 18
6 3
7 3
8 1

To find the mean number of goals scored per game, we would need to find the sum of all 232 numbers, then divide that sum by 232. Rather than add 232 numbers, we use the fact that the same numbers appear many times. For example, the number 0 appears 19 times, the number 1 appears 49 times, the number 2 appears 60 times, etc.

If we add up 19 zeros, we get 0. If we add up 49 ones, we get 49. If we add up 60 twos, we get 120. Repeated addition is multiplication.

Thus, the sum of the 232 numbers = 0(19) + 1(49) + 2(60) + 3(47) + 4(32) + 5(18) + 6(3) + 7(3) + 8(1) = 575. The mean is 575 / 232 = 2.478448.

This way of calculating a mean is sometimes referred to as a weighted average, since each value is “weighted” by its frequency.

library(PASWR2)
FT <- xtabs(~goals, data = SOCCER)
FT
goals
0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8
19 49 60 47 32 18  3  3  1 
pgoal <- FT/575
pgoal
goals
0           1           2           3           4           5
0.033043478 0.085217391 0.104347826 0.081739130 0.055652174 0.031304348
6           7           8
0.005217391 0.005217391 0.001739130 
ngoals <- as.numeric(names(FT))
ngoals
[1] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
weighted.mean(x = ngoals, w = pgoal)
[1] 2.478448
mean(SOCCER$goals, na.rm = TRUE) [1] 2.478448 Median The median ($$M$$) is the midpoint of the distribution. It is the number such that half of the observations fall above and half fall below. To find the median: • Order the data from smallest to largest • Consider whether $$n$$, the number of observations, is even or odd. • If $$n$$ is odd, the median $$M$$ is the center observation in the ordered list. This observation is the one “sitting” in the $$(n + 1)/2$$ spot in the ordered list • If $$n$$ is even,the median $$M$$ is the mean of the two center observations in the ordered list. These two observations are the ones “sitting” in the $$n/2$$ and $$(n/2) + 1$$ spots in the ordered list. For the SOCCER example, the median number of goals is the average of the values at the 232/2 = 116 ordered location (a two) and the 232/2 + 1 = 117 ordered location (also a two). The average of two 2s is a 2. Using the median function in R below verifies the answer. median(SOCCER$goals, na.rm = TRUE)
[1] 2

Comparing the Mean and Median

As we have seen, the mean and the median, the most common measures of center, each describe the center of a distribution of values in a different way. The mean describes the center as an average value, in which the actual values of the data points play an important role. The median, on the other hand, locates the middle value as the center, and the order of the data is the key to finding it.

To get a deeper understanding of the differences between these two measures of center, consider the following example.

Here are two datasets:

Data set A $$\rightarrow$$ (64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73)

Data set B $$\rightarrow$$ (64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 730)

DataA <- c(64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73)
DataB <- c(64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 730)
meanA <- mean(DataA)
meanB <- mean(DataB)
medianA <- median(DataA)
medianB <- median(DataB)
c(meanA, meanB, medianA, medianB)
[1]  68.14286 162.00000  68.00000  68.00000

For dataset A, the mean is 68.1428571, and the median is 68. Looking at dataset B, notice that all of the observations except the last one are close together. The observation 730 is very large, and is certainly an outlier. In this case, the median is still 68, but the mean will be influenced by the high outlier, and shifted up to 162. The message that we should take from this example is:

The mean is very sensitive to outliers (because it factors in their magnitude), while the median is resistant to outliers.

Therefore:

• For symmetric distributions with no outliers: $$\bar{x}$$ is approximately equal to $$M$$.

In the distribution above, the mean is 9.9965127 and the median is 9.9925812.

• For skewed right distributions and/or data sets with high outliers: $$\bar{x} > M$$

In the distribution above, the mean is 0.1998402 and the median is 0.168208.

• For skewed left distributions and/or data sets with high outliers: $$\bar{x} < M$$

In the distribution above, the mean is 1.8001598 and the median is 1.831792.

We will therefore use $$\bar{x}$$ as a measure of center for symmetric distributions with no outliers. Otherwise, the median will be a more appropriate measure of the center of our data.

So far we have learned about different ways to quantify the center of a distribution. A measure of center by itself is not enough, though, to describe a distribution. Consider the following two distributions of exam scores. Both distributions are centered around 70 (the mean and median of both distributions is approximately 70), but the distributions are quite different. The first distribution has a much larger variability in scores compared to the second one.

In order to describe the distribution, we therefore need to supplement the graphical display not only with a measure of center, but also with a measure of the variability (or spread) of the distribution.

Range

The range covered by the data is the most intuitive measure of variability. The range is exactly the distance between the smallest data point (Min) and the largest one (Max). Range = Max - Min

Standard Deviation

The idea behind the standard deviation is to quantify the spread of a distribution by measuring how far the observations are from their mean, $$\bar{x}$$. The standard deviation gives the average (or typical distance) between a data point and the mean, $$\bar{x}$$.

Notation

There are many notations for the standard deviation: SD, s, Sd, StDev. Here, we’ll use SD as an abbreviation for standard deviation and use s as the symbol.

Calculation

In order to get a better understanding of the standard deviation, it would be useful to see an example of how it is calculated. In practice, we will use statistical software to do the calculation.

Video Store Calculations

The following are the number of customers who entered a video store in 8 consecutive hours:

7, 9, 5, 13, 3, 11, 15, 9

To find the standard deviation of the number of hourly customers:

1. Find the mean, $$\bar{x}$$ of your data: $$7 + 9 + 5 + ... + 98 = 9$$

2. Find the deviations from the mean: the difference between each observation and the mean $$(7 - 9), (9 - 9), (5 - 9), (13 - 9), (3 - 9), (11 - 9), (15 - 9), (9 - 9)$$

3. These numbers are $$-2, 0, -4, 4, -6, 2, 6, 0$$

4. Since the standard deviation is the average (typical) distance between the data points and their mean, it would make sense to average the deviations we got. Note, however, that the sum of the deviations from the mean, $$\bar{x}$$, is 0 (add them up and see for yourself). This is always the case, and is the reason why we have to do a more complicated calculation to determine the standard deviation

5. Square each of the deviations: The first few are: $$(-2)^2 = 4, (0)^2 = 0, (-4)^2 = 16$$, and the rest are $$16, 36, 4, 36, 0$$

6. Average the square deviations by adding them up and dividing by $$n - 1$$ (one less than the sample size): $$4+0+16+16+36+4+36+0(8-1)=1127=16$$

• The reason why we “sort of” average the square deviations (divide by $$n -1$$ ) rather than take the actual average (divide by ) is beyond the scope of the course at this point, but will be addressed later.

• This average of the squared deviations is called the variance of the data.

1. The SD of the data is the square root of the variance: SD $$= \sqrt{16} = 4$$
• Why do we take the square root? Note that 16 is an average of the squared deviations, and therefore has different units of measurement. In this case 16 is measured in “squared customers”, which obviously cannot be interpreted. We therefore take the square root in order to compensate for the fact that we squared our deviations and in order to go back to the original unit of measurement.

Recall that the average number of customers who enter the store in an hour is 9. The interpretation of SD = 4 is that, on average, the actual number of customers that enter the store each hour is 4 away from 9.

x <- c(7, 9, 5, 13, 3, 11, 15, 9)
n <- length(x)
xbar <- mean(x)
xbar
[1] 9
dev <- x - xbar
dev
[1] -2  0 -4  4 -6  2  6  0
dev2 <- dev^2
dev2
[1]  4  0 16 16 36  4 36  0
cbind(x, dev, dev2)
      x dev dev2
[1,]  7  -2    4
[2,]  9   0    0
[3,]  5  -4   16
[4,] 13   4   16
[5,]  3  -6   36
[6,] 11   2    4
[7,] 15   6   36
[8,]  9   0    0
VAR <- sum(dev2)/(n - 1)
VAR
[1] 16
SD <- sqrt(VAR)
SD
[1] 4
# Or using functions var() and sd()
var(x)
[1] 16
sd(x)
[1] 4