Archive

Archive for the ‘MIND’ Category

Paper published: Modular organization of functional network connectivity

December 19th, 2011

Modular organization of functional network connectivity in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia during the resting state
Qingbao Yu, Sergey M Plis, Erik B Erhardt, Elena A Allen, Jing Sui, Kent A Kiehl, Godfrey Pearlson, Vince D Calhoun
2011 Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract
Neuroimaging studies have shown that functional brain networks composed from select regions of interest (ROIs) have a modular community structure. However, the organization of functional network connectivity (FNC), comprising a purely data-driven network built from spatially independent brain components, is not yet clear. The aim of this study is to explore the modular organization of FNC in both healthy controls (HCs) and patients with schizophrenia (SZs). Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) data of HCs and SZs were decomposed into independent components (ICs) by group independent component analysis (ICA). Then weighted brain networks (in which nodes are brain components) were built based on correlations between ICA time courses. Clustering coefficients and connectivity strength of the networks were computed. A dynamic branch cutting algorithm was used to identify modules of the FNC in HCs and SZs. Results show stronger connectivity strength and higher clustering coefficient in HCs with more and smaller modules in SZs. In addition, HCs and SZs had some different hubs. Our findings demonstrate altered modular architecture of the FNC in schizophrenia and provide insights into abnormal topological organization of intrinsic brain networks in this mental illness.

MIND, Research

Paper published: SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability

December 9th, 2011

Our paper detailing our simulation toolbox (SimTB) has been published in NeuroImage.

SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability
Erik B. Erhardt, Elena A. Allen, Yonghua Wei, Tom Eichele, Vince D. Calhoun
NeuroImage
Available online 8 December 2011, published online 5 Jan 2012
ISSN 1053-8119, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.088
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.088)
Keywords: simulation; fMRI; group analysis

SimTB flowchart for simulation of fMRI data

Abstract
We introduce SimTB, a MATLAB toolbox designed to simulate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets under a model of spatiotemporal separability. The toolbox meets the increasing need of the fMRI community to more comprehensively understand the effects of complex processing strategies by providing a ground truth that estimation methods may be compared against. SimTB captures the fundamental structure of real data, but data generation is fully parameterized and fully controlled by the user, allowing for accurate and precise comparisons. The toolbox offers a wealth of options regarding the number and configuration of spatial sources, implementation of experimental paradigms, inclusion of tissue-specific properties, addition of noise and head movement, and much more. A straightforward data generation method and short computation time (3–10 seconds for each dataset) allow a practitioner to simulate and analyze many datasets to potentially understand a problem from many angles. Beginning MATLAB users can use the SimTB graphical user interface (GUI) to design and execute simulations while experienced users can write batch scripts to automate and customize this process. The toolbox is freely available at http://mialab.mrn.org/software together with sample scripts and tutorials.

Keyword: simulation; fMRI; group analysis

MIND, Research

Paper published: Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study

October 14th, 2011

Our paper using our simulation toolbox (SimTB) detailing what can be learned about multi-subject ICA on fMRI data has been published in NeuroImage.

Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: A simulation study
Elena A. Allen, Erik B. Erhardt, Yonghua Wei, Tom Eichele, Vince D. Calhoun
NeuroImage, Available online 14 October 2011, ISSN 1053-8119, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.010.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911011712)
Keywords: fMRI; Inter-subject variability; Group ICA; Multi-subject; Model order; Simulations

Abstract
A key challenge in functional neuroimaging is the meaningful combination of results across subjects. Even in a sample of healthy participants, brain morphology and functional organization exhibit considerable variability, such that no two individuals have the same neural activation at the same location in response to the same stimulus. This inter-subject variability limits inferences at the group-level as average activation patterns may fail to represent the patterns seen in individuals. A promising approach to multi-subject analysis is group independent component analysis (GICA), which identifies group components and reconstructs activations at the individual level. GICA has gained considerable popularity, particularly in studies where temporal response models cannot be specified. However, a comprehensive understanding of the performance of GICA under realistic conditions of inter-subject variability is lacking. In this study we use simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to determine the capabilities and limitations of GICA under conditions of spatial, temporal, and amplitude variability. Simulations, generated with the SimTB toolbox, address questions that commonly arise in GICA studies, such as: (1) How well can individual subject activations be estimated and when will spatial variability preclude estimation? (2) Why does component splitting occur and how is it affected by model order? (3) How should we analyze component features to maximize sensitivity to intersubject differences? Overall, our results indicate an excellent capability of GICA to capture between-subject differences and we make a number of recommendations regarding analytic choices for application to functional imaging data.

MIND, Research

Paper published: On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller

June 8th, 2011

For the second issue of Brain Connectivity, a new journal, we were invited to provide a response to a “controversial article” about issues of analysis and interpretation in fMRI.  In a fun paper, Elena, Eswar, Vince, and I provide our perspective and some better practices to continue the dialogue.

On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller
Erik B. Erhardt, Elena A. Allen, Eswar Damaraju, Vince D. Calhoun.
Brain Connectivity 1(2), 2011.

Abstract
In the decade and a half since Biswal’s fortuitous discovery of spontaneous correlations in functional imaging data, the field of functional connectivity (FC) has seen exponential growth resulting in the identification of widely-replicated intrinsic networks and the innovation of novel analytic methods with the promise of diagnostic application.  As such a young field undergoing rapid change, we have yet to converge upon a desired and needed set of standards.  In this issue, Habeck and Moeller begin a dialogue for developing best practices by providing four criticisms with respect to FC estimation methods, interpretation of FC networks, assessment of FC network features in classifying sub-populations, and network visualization.  Here, we respond to Habeck and Moeller and provide our own perspective on the concerns raised in the hope that the neuroimaging field will benefit from this discussion.

MIND, Research

A simulation toolbox for fMRI data: SimTB

May 11th, 2011

Update: both papers have been published, simulation toolbox and inter-subject variability.

Elena Allen and I recently submitted two papers that detail a simulation toolbox for fMRI data (SimTB) and capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis (ICA) using simulations. It’s been an exciting and interesting project because we can at last generate interesting and complex datasets to use as a “ground truth” to compare estimation and processing techniques.  We’ve learned a lot about the limits of some methods, as well as their robustness.  The papers will be submitted next week.  For those with MATLAB, it’s available at http://mialab.mrn.org/software.

SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability
EB Erhardt, EA Allen, Y Wei, T Eichele, VD Calhoun. (2011)

We introduce SimTB, a MATLAB toolbox designed to simulate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets under a model of spatiotemporal separability. The toolbox meets the increasing need of the fMRI community to more comprehensively understand the effects of complex processing strategies by providing a ground truth that estimation methods may be compared against. SimTB captures the fundamental structure of real data, but data generation is fully parameterized and fully controlled by the user, allowing for accurate and precise comparisons. The toolbox offers a wealth of options regarding the number and configuration of spatial sources, implementation of experimental paradigms, inclusion of tissue-specific properties, addition of noise and head movement, and much more. A straightforward data generation method and short computation time (3-10 seconds for each dataset) allow a practitioner to simulate and analyze many datasets to potentially understand a problem from many angles. Beginning MATLAB users can use the SimTB graphical user interface (GUI) to design and execute simulations while experienced users can write batch scripts to automate and customize this process. The toolbox is freely available at http://mialab.mrn.org/software together with sample scripts and tutorials.

Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study
EA Allen, EB Erhardt, Y Wei, T Eichele, VD Calhoun. (2011)

A key challenge in functional neuroimaging is the meaningful combination of results across subjects. Even in a sample of healthy participants, brain morphology and functional organization exhibit considerable variability, such that no two individuals have the same neural activation at the same location in response to the same stimulus. This inter-subject variability limits inferences at the group-level as average activation patterns may fail to represent the patterns seen in individuals. A promising approach to multi-subject analysis is group independent components analysis (GICA), which identities group components and reconstructs activations at the individual level. GICA has gained considerable popularity, particularly in studies where temporal response models cannot be speci ed. However, a comprehensive understanding of the performance of GICA under realistic conditions of inter-subject variability is lacking. In this study we use simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to determine the capabilities and limitations of GICA under conditions of spatial, temporal, and amplitude variability. Simulations, generated with the SimTB toolbox, address questions that commonly arise in GICA studies, such as: (1) How well can individual subject activations be estimated and when will spatial variability preclude estimation? (2) Why does component splitting occur and how is it a ected by model order? (3) How should we analyze component features to maximize sensitivity to intersubject differences? Overall, our results indicate an excellent capability of GICA to capture between-subject differences and we make a number of recommendations regarding analytic choices for application to functional imaging data.

SimTB flowchart for simulation of fMRI data

MIND, Research

Paper published: A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting state networks

February 4th, 2011

In this paper we’ve put together a cohort of so-called “healthy normal controls” in the largest single group independent component analysis (ICA) forward model. Included in our analysis approach is a statistical methodology for performing mancova when the number of fMRI brain voxels (roughly V=60K) to test for activation differences over demographic variables is much larger than the number of subjects (N=603).  This massive project involved researchers nearly spanning our Medical Image Analysis Laboratory (MIALab), but many other investigators at the Mind Research Network (MRN).  It is a great example of what makes collaboration fun, challenging, and productive (thank you Elena, Eswar, Bill, Judith, Martin, and Srinivas).

A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting state networks

http://www.frontiersin.org/systems_neuroscience/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002/abstract

Read more…

MIND, Research

Paper published: Comparison of multi-subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data

December 15th, 2010

Erhardt, EB, Rachakonda, S, Bedrick, EJ, Allen, EA, Adali, T, and Calhoun, VD, Comparison of multi-subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data. Human Brain Mapping, n/a. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21170

This is my first postdoc paper at the Mind Research Network.

MIND, Research

Visions

March 15th, 2010

A few important areas of focus, reflecting what I’m doing and where I’m going. Read more…

MIND, Research, stable isotopes, Statistics

RA at MIND Institute begins

February 6th, 2009

On Jan 20th, 2009, I joined the Medical Image Analysis Laboratory (MIALab) as a research assistant (RA) at the MIND institute at UNM.  This position will transition to a 2-3 year postdoc upon the completion of my PhD this May. Read more…

MIND